Update: July 4, 2010
LUBA Ruling Prevents Unlawful Takings by the City of Hillsboro and the Port of Portland
The Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals ("LUBA") issued a final order in Barnes v. City of Hillsboro, LUBA No. 2010-011 on June 30, 2010 in favor of petitioner's appeal, reversing the City's rezoning of over 7,000 parcels located within 6,000 feet of the Hillsboro Airport...This case prevents the City from overreaching in its efforts to grant the airport widespread access to neighboring property to directly and adversely impact new development which may not even affect airport operations.
Update: May 22, 2010
Legal Challenges to Hillsboro Airport Expansion
At present there are two important citizen-initiated legal actions related to the Hillsboro Airport: a land use appeal and a third runway challenge.
Update: April 15, 2010
Citizens Challenge Hillsboro Airport Expansion
Three private citizens are challenging the Federal Aviation Administration's approval of a new, third runway at Hillsboro Airport. The residents request that the court set aside the Federal Aviation Administration's decision and direct the agency to comply with federal environmental law by preparing an Environmental Impact Statement.
Update: February 18, 2010
Hillsboro Airport Zoning Change Precipitates Appeal to Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals
If you live in or own one of the approximately 6,500 properties impacted by this change, the Port of Portland now controls many aspects of what you can do with your property, rendering you even more vulnerable to the significant noise, pollution, negative health impacts, safety and security risks posed by the Hillsboro Airport.
Update: December 3, 2009
Unnecessary Third Runway at Hillsboro Airport Constitutes Misuse of Public Funds
The Port of Portland and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have failed to establish any need whatsoever for a third runway at Hillsboro Airport (HIO). As a result, plans to invest $17 million in taxpayer monies on this wasteful and totally unnecessary pork barrel extravagance should be immediately halted.
Update: March 6, 2009
Stop Squandering Taxpayer Dollars on For-Profit Private Aviation
Invest instead in public transportation, education, and the social services.
Update: September 8, 2008
Private Aviation Feeds at Public Trough
Commercial airline passengers are now expected to pay fees to check their luggage. Meanwhile, billions in federal funds have been spent to fix up remote airports that primarily serve private jets.
Update: June 26, 2008
Congress and FAA fiddle while airlines burn
FAA and Congressional Committee analyze the elephant - but fail to identify it.
On June 9, 2008, the American Working Group on National Policy, Inc. (AWGNP) issued a negative and critical review of Your Flight Has Been Delayed, a report by the Congressional Joint Economic Committee (JEC).
Update: April 14, 2008
Aviation Industry Taps Educational Dollars
There was a time when the author would have wholeheartedly favored a Portland Community College bond levy. Unfortunately the Rock Creek Aviation Sciences program, which has foisted unrelenting noise, pollution, safety and security risks on area residents, has severely eroded this voter's commitment.
Hillsboro Airport Issues Roundtable Caters to Aviation Industry
The Port of Portland states that the Hillsboro Airport Issues Roundtable (HAIR) "represents the airport's diverse stakeholders." What, exactly, does the Port mean by diversity?
Update: September 26, 2007
GA Airports, Flight Training, and 9/11
More than 6 years after the 9/11 attack very little has been done to mandate security guidelines at general aviation airports—even though 75% of the air traffic in this country is classified as general aviation.
Update: August 13, 2007
Climate Warming, A New Look
General aviation significantly increases the contribution of aviation activity to global warming—a news release from the American Working Group for National Policy, Inc. (awgnp@comcast.net).
Update: June 20, 2007
Public Subsidizing Private Aviation
Oregon Senate Bill (SB) 807, sponsored by Senator Betsy Johnson, had provisions by which surrounding communities could have been taxed on behalf of rural airport owners and operators eager to line their pockets at public expense.
Public Subsidizes Corporate Jets at Oregon's North Bend Airport
The New York Times reports that "Airline passengers and lottery players are paying for a $31 million expansion of the North Bend Airport to serve the 5,000 business jets that arrive each year, filled almost entirely with golfers."
Update: April 23, 2007
Public Subsidies for Airports Benefit Few
The Hillsboro Airport Master Plan reveals the intent of the Port of Portland in league with the FAA to gouge taxpayers across this land for $126 million dollars over the next 15 years to finance improvements at this "executive" general aviation airport which primarily caters to corporate jet interests, flight training, and general aviation hobbyists. And what do we as members of the public receive in return for this bestowal of corporate welfare?
Update: January 2, 2007
The Port of Portland: A Major Overhaul is Long Overdue
Ever wonder why the Port of Portland seems unresponsive to citizen concerns? One reason may be that, unlike all the other port authorities in the state of Oregon, the Port of Portland's commissioners are not elected by the people they supposedly represent.
Update: December 6, 2006
Washington County Aviation Accidents
Washington County has been the site of at least 72 aviation accidents, more than twice as many as Portland, since 1986 even though Washington County in its entirety has a smaller population than the City of Portland.
- Hillsboro's Aviation Accidents Far Greater Than Portland's
- General Aviation Pilots More Accident Prone than Commercial Pilots
- Student Pilots Involved in Nearly Half of Hillsboro's Aviation Accidents
and more ...
Update: November 16, 2006
New Links
See the Government page for several new links to chapters of the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) relating to land use and transportation. We've also added a link on the Noise page for the Washington County Noise Control Task Force, which studied noise management in unincorporated Washington County from 2003 to 2005.
Update: September 13, 2006
On Airport Expansion and the Washington County Fair Board
At first glance the link between Washington County airport expansion and the Washington County Fair Board is not entirely evident. However a glimpse beneath the surface, in conjunction with a review of pertinent documentation, reveals some disturbing undercurrents with Richard Vial, the Chair of the Fair Board, as a significant connecting link.
Update: August 8, 2006
Aviation Accidents in Oregon
The fiery explosion last month in a residential area when an airplane departing the Hillsboro Airport crashed in a nearby neighborhood has understandably caused many residents to ponder the dangers that aviation activities pose to their lives and to their properties...
Update: June 20, 2006
Aviation Noise: Health and Learning Impacts
Washington County residents are subjected to the noise pollution of more aircraft operations than any other county in the entire state of Oregon...
Update: June 8, 2006
Citizen Representation: A Double Standard for Airports
The manner by which the Port of Portland approaches citizen involvement at the Hillsboro Airport reflects a glaring disparity when juxtaposed with how the Port has historically addressed this same issue at Portland International Airport (PDX)...
Airports: Important Economic Engines?
Really? Is your local airport an important economic engine? ...
Hillsboro Airport: The Facts
In some months there are actually more landings and take-offs at Hillsboro than at PDX...
| ©2007 Oregon Aviation Revealed | Contact Us | Jump to Top |
Jump to Top